I'm genuinely starting to think 4chan is worse at theorizing than Reddit.

I hate how people have monetized our content on here

Makes me feel retarded I didnt start doing this a decade ago

Ive been browsing 4chan all day for like 10 years now, I could have built a massive twitter account reposting shit i see here first before anyone else

fuck

>>61496568
thats on tradingview, im talking about the cunts the repost on twitter, i see them get tens of millions of views on single posts of just screenshotting and reposting a 4chan post

Rizon staff and #4chan IRC mods think ACK is real and a spammer.

>>728600389
You can tell what men are unhinged and should be killed by how they post on 4chan

>>728600435
Thats not true though. Because lots of people on 4chan just pretend to be retarded for (You)s but then behave perfectly normal in real life.

>>107565421
>ai board is never happening, no matter how much blue board porn you post. sometimes you have to accept some facts about the world is immutable

I know, sometimes the fight is impossible and that's something you have to accept. Whatever comes after this place falls hopefully something like 4chan can rise from its ashes

>24949807
>24949873
>If, according to Gnosticism, the material world was created by an ignorant or malevolent Demiurge, why did the higher, benevolent source of reality allow such a being or such a world to come into existence?
>The Monad allows the Demiurge's reality to exist
>By allowing Sophia to create the Demiurge
The Absoute (the One, Monad) does not allow or disallow. The Absolute is not the creator of reality or responsible for it. An abstracted, knowable aspect of the Absolute is. The how varies by tradition.

>24949828
There aren't multiple gods in Gnosticism, there is the collective Godhead of the Pleroma.

>24949873
>the Monad could experience imperfection and the cycle of life.
>experiencing Oneness
The Monad does not and cannot experience. There is no experience of oneness. Ego death is a necessity.
>To dwell within the Pleroma is to thrive within Heaven-Nirvana
The Pleroma is not an analog for the Christian Heaven. The Pistis Sophia puts heaven outside of the Pleroma.

>24949883
The Archons aren't gods.
>The high god doesn't actually do stuff, it's like the Neoplatonist 'Intellect' that creates the world of forms
Categorical error. The 'Intellect' is an abstraction of the Monad.
>Basically it's Platonism for retarded incels who hate the world.
It's a reconciliation of Platonism and Christianity for Christians. Kabbalah is Platonism for Jews, Sufism for Muslims.

>24949910
Christians don't even understand their own religion.

>24950052
>we hate reality
Reality isn't the problem, materiality is. Reality is not confined to materiality, it continues onward and upward into the Pleroma.
>existence itself is a punishment.
The same is true for existence. Existence is not the problem, materiality is. Existence is not confined to materiality.

>24950552
>the monad isnt a being ... its merely existence itself
The Monad isn't existence.

>24950587
>ascent seems to merely be a sort of destruction
Not at all. Nothing is destroyed by returning.
>God cannot lack what creatures possess
That's why the distinction is made between the unknowable God, the Monad, and the abstracted knowable God, God the Father. It's a key feature.
>The distinction that seems to be missing is that things that are many in creatures are absolutely one in God, but known as many to us.
That's Hasidism. Hasidism is very much a Gnostic tradition like Kabbalah or Hermeticism. In Gnostic cosmology, separation from the Monad is metaphysical reality. In Hasidic cosmology, it's just a matter of perspective; it only appears to us that we are separated from God's divine light.

>24950590
The Monad isn't benevolent.

>24950605
That's also true in Gnosticism and Gnostic derived traditions.

>24950611
This is more or less the view of Kabbalists and Hermetics, that materiality and the Demiurge aren't evil, they're just imperfect.

Sorry, 4chan won't let me reply directly to all of you.

>>83401031
Im coming up on 2 decades. I started 4chan at age 16 and im 34 now. Over half my life. Fuck...i think i need to kms.

>>18236519
>The AI doesnt know what serviceable aircraft are, you evidently also do not know what serviceable aircraft are.
You make something up and then demand that others disproves it.
This tactic only works on 4chan btw.

>What exactly is your source? can you link it? All im getting from google is a link to some highschool paper which has lines that you seem to have taken from it verbatim.
Its this:
https://erenow.org/ww/the-battle-of-britain-myth-and-reality/4.php?
And it's from Richard Overys book The Battle for Britain.
Unlike you, Overy is a historian dont make up lies, and it's clearly stated that pilot shortage was critical during the battle, and that RAF aircraft replacement was continuous because it had never ceased.

>The number of planes they could put in the did not increase
Every single source says the opposite.
Only your lie says this, and you expect everyone else to either disprove your lie or to accept it. Vague and pathetic.

>This is an unquantifiable factor and considering the British recovery was small
Sources say recovery rate was at around 50%.
Same as Luftwaffe pilots taken POW.
Again, you're making up lies.

"Moreover, and importantly, German pilots and aircrew were lost to the battle if they were shot down and captured on British soil. Between 1 July and 31 October, 967 prisoners were taken and 638 bodies definitely identified."

"In addition to these numbers, another advantage for the RAF was that any unfortunate pilot bailing out of his fighter would set down in his parachute on home turf. With survival rates of pilots bailing out of their stricken fighter at 60 to 70 percent, the pilot could eventually return to his squadron barring serious injury."


>So if The RAF losing is scifi, well, why did they lose in France?
Is this your main go-to argument now to prove your lie? Just because you have nothing to back it up with
"lul if the Wehrmacht was losing at Berlin in 1945 then how come they won during Barbarossa?"